United States βΊ Grid βΊ Interconnection queues βΊ Missouri
OCTARY USA Β· INTERCONNECTION QUEUESOnshore wind interconnection queue in Missouri
Before a new power plant or battery can connect to the US grid, it joins a queue for studies and an interconnection agreement. Most requests never get built. This shows every request: active, built and withdrawn.
Map
Requests
| Project | Capacity | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Onshore wind project GI-83, Randolph County Onshore wind |
1,018 MW | Agreement signed |
| Onshore wind project GI-122, Randolph County Onshore wind |
500 MW | In study |
| Onshore wind project J1026, Audrain County Onshore wind |
400 MW | Agreement signed |
| Onshore wind project J1025, Knox County Onshore wind |
300 MW | Agreement signed |
| Onshore wind project J3929, Audrain County Onshore wind |
250 MW | In study |
| Onshore wind project GI-95, Dade County Onshore wind |
247 MW | Agreement signed |
| Onshore wind project J476, Atchison County Onshore wind |
246 MW | Agreement signed |
| Onshore wind project GI-53, Nodaway County Onshore wind |
238 MW | Agreement signed |
| Onshore wind project GI-61, Nodaway County Onshore wind |
230 MW | Agreement signed |
| Onshore wind project GI-60, Gentry County Onshore wind |
18.0 MW | Agreement signed |
Capacity in the queue by state
Click a state to drill down.
By grid region
ISO/RTO markets and the non-ISO West and Southeast.
Requests by year joined
Capacity of requests in this view, by the year they entered the queue. Click a year.
Source: Rand, J. et al., Queued Up, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, data through end of 2025. Compiled from the queues of the 7 ISO/RTOs and dozens of non-ISO utilities. A request is a proposal to connect, not a commitment to build: historically most are withdrawn. Capacity is the requested interconnection size; hybrids include the storage component. Transmission lines Β· Planned power plants (EIA)